ABI NexaIntelligence OS
The data & access layer
ΣFundamentals & Filings DataStandardized and as-reported, citedfxExcel Add-inThe cited number in your model{ }Data APIThe whole corpus, programmatic∞MCP ServerThe AI-native connector⛱Research WorkspaceThe whole file, per name
AI-native deliverables
ΣOperating & Valuation ModelsBuilt, sourced, refreshed on the print▤Company Tearsheets & ProfilesThe as-of-date one-pager✎Confidential Information MemorandaThe sell-side document, drafted✎Investment MemorandaThe buy-side write-up, traceable▣Pitch BooksProfiles and precedents, quoted⚟Screening & Idea GenerationScreens across the corpus
Who we serve
BBuy-SideHedge funds & asset managersSSell-Side ResearchEquity researchIBInvestment Banking & Corp DevM&A and coveragePEPrivate Equity & VCDeal teams, diligence to model▣CorporatesStrategy, IR and FP&A{ }Data & Quant TeamsAgents and pipelines
Plans Methodology Resources Request access
Products
Fundamentals & Filings DataStandardized and as-reported, citedExcel Add-inThe cited number in your modelData APIThe whole corpus, programmaticMCP ServerThe AI-native connectorResearch WorkspaceThe whole file, per name
Solutions
Operating & Valuation ModelsBuilt, sourced, refreshed on the printCompany Tearsheets & ProfilesThe as-of-date one-pagerConfidential Information MemorandaThe sell-side document, draftedInvestment MemorandaThe buy-side write-up, traceablePitch BooksProfiles and precedents, quotedScreening & Idea GenerationScreens across the corpus
Clients
Buy-SideHedge funds & asset managersSell-Side ResearchEquity researchInvestment Banking & Corp DevM&A and coveragePrivate Equity & VCDeal teams, diligence to modelCorporatesStrategy, IR and FP&AData & Quant TeamsAgents and pipelines
PlansMethodologyResources
Request access
AI-Native Solution

Screen on what was filed, not on what was assumed.

Fundamental, financial and valuation-multiple screens across the whole corpus, where a missing figure drops a name from that test rather than quietly scoring it zero.

Request accessSee the platform
See it

A real screen, honest about the gaps.

Real, cited ABI Nexa output. Use the arrows or dots to move through.

The screen
A value screen across large-caps
A fundamental and valuation screen runs across the corpus on the figures each company actually filed. Set the criteria and the universe ranks itself.
EV / EBITDA < 25x P / E < 30x EV / Sales any
A gap is not a zero
The most common way a screen lies
The usual failure is to score a missing value as zero, which quietly floats the name to the top of a cheapness screen. We exclude it from that one test instead.
Scored as zeroJPM reads EV/EBITDA 0.0x and tops the screen it should never be in.
On ABI NexaExcluded, not rankedJPM drops from the EBITDA test and is judged on P/E and P/TBV instead.

Nvidia, by contrast, fails on a real number, 39.8x against a 25x limit. A miss and a gap are treated differently.

One definition, point-in-time
Comparable, and no lookahead
The same field definitions and period logic apply in every market, so a cross-market screen compares like with like, and a historical screen sees only what was known on the date.
Screen integrityTwo guarantees
One field definition across US and Indialike for like
Sees only what was filed by the dateno lookahead
Restated numbers held separatelyas first reported

A result opens straight into the workspace on that name, and joins the deal comps for a takeover screen.

What you get

What lands on your desk.

Screen the whole corpus

Fundamental, financial and valuation-multiple screens across every covered name, on the figures each company actually filed.

A gap excludes, never scores zero

A missing value drops the name from that test instead of floating it to the top, so the ranking is honest.

One definition across markets

The same field logic in every market, so a cross-market screen compares like with like.

Point-in-time, no lookahead

A historical screen sees only what was known on the date, so a backtest does not peek.

From a result into the file

A hit opens straight into the workspace on that name, so the screen is a doorway, not a dead-end list.

Joins to the deal comps

Screen results tie to precedent transactions, so a takeover screen is one step away.

In practice

How it changes the day.

01

A gap is not a zero

A gap excludes the name from that test; it is never treated as a zero, so the ranking is honest.

screens on what was filed
By hand today
Run a screen that scores a missing value as zero and mis-ranks the name.
02

One definition everywhere

The same field definitions and period logic apply in every market, so a cross-market screen compares like with like.

like compared with like
By hand today
Compare names across markets on fields that mean different things.
03

From screen to file

A result opens straight into the workspace on that name, and joins to the deal comps for a takeover screen.

in one click
By hand today
Hit a dead end at a list of tickers.
From screen to finished work.
Research Workspace. Open a result into the full file.Operating & Valuation Models. Model the survivors.Investment Memoranda. Write up the idea.Data API. Run the screen programmatically.
7,500+
pre-built models, US, India and foreign filers
15 years
of history, restatements kept
29.8M
facts, each one cited
0
wrong on the source-verified sample

See it on your own coverage.

Tell us the names and markets you follow and we will show you the desk on them.

Request access